Potential Defeat of Bill C-49
The government's proposed immigration legislation to deter human trafficking and human smuggling (Bill C-49 Preventing Human Smugglers from Abusing Canada's Immigration System Act), is likely to be defeated by opposition parties. The proposed bill is said to be widely supported by the Canadian public but not by the immigration industry (including immigration consultants and refugee lawyers) who has a financial stake in the outcome.
Bill C-49 would have saved Canadians millions of dollars per year, and improved the integrity and financial viability of Canada's immigration system by enabling immigration and law enforcement officials to prevent, deter and prosecute immigration fraud, human smuggling and trafficking of persons to Canada. It would also have expanded Canada's ability to detect and prevent money-laundering activities that are an integral part of every illegal human trafficking and human smuggling operation.
The potential defeat of Bill C-49 means that, to the outside world, Canada is seen as taking a weak approach to human trafficking and human smuggling and acting inconsistently with its obligations under international law to fully and effectively implement the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and two supplementary protocols, The Protocol Against the Smuggling of Migrants, and The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons.
Difference between Human Trafficking and Smuggling
Human smuggling involves the illegal movement of people across borders and is by definition, international. Unlike trafficked persons, smuggled persons usually consent to being smuggled and voluntarily pay large sums of money to the smugglers in advance.
Human trafficking is a modern form of slavery, defined as any act that involves the transport, harbouring, or sale of persons through coercion, force, kidnapping, deception or fraud, for the purposes of placing them in a situation of forced prostitution, domestic servitude, debt bondage or other slavery-like practice.
Human trafficking can be local, national or international - a person may be trafficked from a small town to a large city within the same country, or trafficked to another country.
People that are smuggled are not deprived of liberty when they arrive at their destination, whereas those who are trafficked are deprived of their liberty in one of several ways - they are typically coerced, threatened or physically abused and are usually forced to provide free labour or services, forced into the sex trade, or forced to pay substantial sums to the traffickers for long periods of time.
The destruction of identification or travel documents is a sign of human trafficking, not usually smuggling. Trafficked persons are usually ordered to destroy their travel documents to protect the traffickers. Often the traffickers will destroy the travel documents of the persons they are trafficking as a means of controlling them.
A smuggling operation can become a trafficking operation. Migrants may agree to be smuggled on a migrant ship and once on board, become victims of trafficking. This can happen if the smugglers force migrants to provide services (often sexual), labour, or payments of some kind on the vessel or after arrival in Canada, under circumstances where the migrants fear for their safety or that of someone known to them if they refuse to provide that service, labour or payment.
When migrants, or their families, continue to be financially indebted to a person or a group who facilitated, financed or effected their illegal arrival in a country, that is evidence of human trafficking, not human smuggling.
Money Laundering Connection
All human smuggling and human trafficking activities involve money laundering. Money laundering is a process whereby the proceeds of crime are transformed into apparently legitimate money or other assets. Human trafficking and human smuggling are crimes in most countries, including Canada. Any money paid to traffickers and smugglers is proceeds of crime. Because criminals need to integrate their criminal proceeds back into the legitimate financial system, the funds must be laundered. Canada was criticized by the FATF during its Mutual Evaluation of Canada for its weak enforcement of anti-money laundering laws and its failure to comply with international anti-money laundering and counter terrorist financing standards. The potential defeat of Bill C-49 may not bode well for Canada during its next Mutual Evaluation by the international community.
Recent Comments